itdudeitdude wrote:...some refinements and few more variations.
What do you think?
can you send me the orignal files you used for the log?
I'm really intreated in using your logo.
Hi Daniel i've sent the original files already... you can check it out at "webmaster@opencart.com"
Kindly let me know if you need anything else. Have a great day!
i've sent the original files already... you can check it out at "webmaster@opencart.com"Kindly let me know if you need anything else. Have a great day!
Web Design & Programming?
IT-Dude.com ...LOW COST but SUPERB outcome!
... ... loving OpenCart more everyday =]
Wow! I love the new typography on the current logo above =) simple and clear...but the edges are a little jagged though, especially at the bottom curve. What font is that? IMO the ICON part is the only thing that needs improvement now. Would be nice to be something more meaningful rather than just a random shape and a straightforward CART graphics... Just a thought
Web Design & Programming?
IT-Dude.com ...LOW COST but SUPERB outcome!
... ... loving OpenCart more everyday =]
I've been using these...
Futura Lt BT
Myriad
BaryonDisplaySSi
BauderieScriptSSi
Futura Lt BT
Myriad
BaryonDisplaySSi
BauderieScriptSSi
Web Design & Programming?
IT-Dude.com ...LOW COST but SUPERB outcome!
... ... loving OpenCart more everyday =]
Suggestion, moderate the early images so that they are visibly in-line. Why must they be downloaded in order to see them? This thread goes through 2.5 pages with no images, then the rest of the 3rd page with two corrupted images. Who would want to download those before seeing them as corrupt? Next come 2 pages and counting with visibly in-line images. Those, finally, are welcome sights, choice notwithstanding.
Branding suggests keeping the current logo -- or just changing the relative sizes of its text and cart if 2.0 is the reason for change. The name counts for more than how much detail or wonderment can be put into artwork of a cart. Typography that goes too far in any direction, such as with too obviously Oriental character strokes or Olde West signboard blocks, does not really help matters.
Branding suggests keeping the current logo -- or just changing the relative sizes of its text and cart if 2.0 is the reason for change. The name counts for more than how much detail or wonderment can be put into artwork of a cart. Typography that goes too far in any direction, such as with too obviously Oriental character strokes or Olde West signboard blocks, does not really help matters.
you realize this was a 4 year old post?butte wrote:Suggestion, moderate the early images so that they are visibly in-line. Why must they be downloaded in order to see them? This thread goes through 2.5 pages with no images, then the rest of the 3rd page with two corrupted images. Who would want to download those before seeing them as corrupt? Next come 2 pages and counting with visibly in-line images. Those, finally, are welcome sights, choice notwithstanding.
Branding suggests keeping the current logo -- or just changing the relative sizes of its text and cart if 2.0 is the reason for change. The name counts for more than how much detail or wonderment can be put into artwork of a cart. Typography that goes too far in any direction, such as with too obviously Oriental character strokes or Olde West signboard blocks, does not really help matters.
Touche. No, I didn't, actually, because something caused it to come up as current, possibly something it it had been edited and triggered that, so I just took it as being for 2.0, actually. However, the point still stands even in retrospect, although nobody will now take time to amend it.
Daniel wrote:itdudeitdude wrote:...
What do you think?
can you send me the orignal files you used for the log?
I'm really intreated in using your logo.
the cart looks is ragged
Mobile App solution based Opencart
➸➵http://i2cart.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
