;-)
So this begs the question of, Where should we focus?neufke wrote:Thank you for this explanation and it makes my decision a lot easier: i will continue to work for this 1 client with OC but without all the hassle of contributing to the project. As said, after days of debugging and reviewing 90% of the code i have a working 2.0.2.0 and i leave it to that. All plugins have also been rewritten that i am using so tomorrow i am going to create the final styles.
;-)
The continue button just doest move forward. Please help. I have double check the the address are correct
http://www.lifedisrupted.com/index.php
account fabio@demelos.com
pass: temp
Thanks.
FD
It is called Opencart Overclocked Edition.
You can find it here: http://villagedefrance.net
Github here: https://github.com/villagedefrance/OpenCart-Overclocked
It is based on OC 1.5.6 and it is now on its 5th release, v1.6.4.
I am open to collaborations and ideas, so if you want to be part of it, do feel free to fork it, or simply contact me.
If you find a bug or feel that you can improve my code, or add a new feature, get in touch.
The Opencart Overclocked Edition project is mostly for store owners, first timers or experienced. The goal is to make things easy to use by all, including customers, with better tools and a clean code based on the Official OC Coding Standards. The next version should bring a responsive (adaptive) frontend "default" template, but for now it is all un-responsive.
James and Daniel are aware of it already and I also spoke to James about it directly at the last Developer Meeting in London in February. But I had no feedback from them since.
OpenCart custom solutions @ https://villagedefrance.net
Will be the better choice - but how about moving forward to a 2.x-like system?
Any plans about?
Full Stack Web Developer :: Dedicated OpenCart Development & Support DACH Region
Contact for Custom Work / Fast Support.
I have no plans to move towards a v2.0 based Overclocked Edition at this time.
The thing is, i don't really believe that frameworks (Bootstrap) are the answer. There are many frameworks around and in my view, choosing one above others is limiting. Also, I see frameworks as fashion accessories, following the latest web trends and then disappearing when a new funky one comes out. This is why I think the core should be kept simple and remain pure Html5 + CSS3, leaving developers free to decide if they want to use a framework for their extensions and themes. Same for LESS, optional but certainly not essential.
However, I agree that responsiveness is necessary, so wherever the project goes, it will have to be responsive.
Looking forward, and if things don't change, then it will probably mean starting a new shopping cart from scratch.
OpenCart custom solutions @ https://villagedefrance.net
Totally agree on keeping the core apart from optional frameworks. I usually just use a generic CSS Reset on my projects and go from there.
Opencart Developer - My Extension Showcase
Contact me at aeon.yoda@gmail.com
More the capabilities 2.x has, like: responsive, online logging, activities, hooks, etc.
And yes, core should be core, not less - and not more.
Releasing only new versions because the contract with a new payment provider is made, is the wrong way of earning money.
1.5.x was very limited with every, I have installed your version several times for customers and it is well done.
But still missing some.
And you version was also build 'only' on 1.5 which had a bad core.
Forking should be started with another approach.
Full Stack Web Developer :: Dedicated OpenCart Development & Support DACH Region
Contact for Custom Work / Fast Support.
Not 2.0.2.0 .. changed generally with 2.x (6 months ago).neufke wrote:On topic then: as of version 2.0.2.0 some of the important config names have been changed (e.g. : config_admin_limit -> config_limit_admin) which is quite annoying
Full Stack Web Developer :: Dedicated OpenCart Development & Support DACH Region
Contact for Custom Work / Fast Support.
Ah, thnx, well, checked, it wasn't changed in 2.0.0.0 so somewhere in between then... ;-)OSWorX wrote:Not 2.0.2.0 .. changed generally with 2.x (6 months ago).neufke wrote:On topic then: as of version 2.0.2.0 some of the important config names have been changed (e.g. : config_admin_limit -> config_limit_admin) which is quite annoying
Code: Select all
$this->config->get('config_limit_admin')
Also 2.0.0._rc from Mai 2014
Full Stack Web Developer :: Dedicated OpenCart Development & Support DACH Region
Contact for Custom Work / Fast Support.
https://github.com/opencart/opencart/is ... t-90649253
i am so so confused!
lol :|
And because why is this a problem?gilaraujo wrote:Well to me THIS is the problem.
https://github.com/opencart/opencart/is ... t-90649253
i am so so confused!
lol :|
Full Stack Web Developer :: Dedicated OpenCart Development & Support DACH Region
Contact for Custom Work / Fast Support.
"dont waste my time posting crap like this. never use shared ssl as its not secure!"
Even if he has a point! is simply not a way to address ANYONE!
I guess i am old, and old fashioned, and still think the internet is not a "jail free card" to be a rude ______ (you can fill the blank). Common sense and manners, isnt that a thing anymore?
I had no 2.0.0._rc, i think it was a downloaded 2.0.0.0 but nonetheless, it is important to mention that config names can change with any version too because i've been searching why all my lists were as long as they were... Maybe it benefits someone... ;-)OSWorX wrote:Having here all 2.x versions, in 2.0.0.0 it isand that version was published last year October.Code: Select all
$this->config->get('config_limit_admin')
Also 2.0.0._rc from Mai 2014
@gilaraujo: i'm getting old too, on the other hand, if the comments keep stacking up and there is nog communication in a project like this, members are starting to be rude too. That is not an excuse but it's human i guess....
The comment @ the bug report is, well, trashy... ;-)
30 sec answer would have been.
"
Hi there, thank you for reporting. however shared SSL is not a secure method and was reversed. Check this link/google this keywords.
Therefore this cannot be implements and i am closing the Issue.
"
As Jeremy Clarkson would say..."how hard can it be!?"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests